https://vesperae.zettacloud.ro/jspui/handle/123456789/467 John of Montesono OP K ÄPELLI, Scriptores 2, pp. 487-488; Q UETIF, E CHARD, Scriptores 1, pp. 691-694. See T. SULLIVAN, Parisian Licentiates in Theology, A.D. 1373-1500. A Biographical Register (Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, 18), Leiden – Boston 2004, p. 258. K ÄPELLI, Scriptores 2, p. 487. K ÄPELLI, Scriptores 2, p. 487; SULLIVAN, Parisian Licentiates, p. 258. CUP, 3, n o 1556-1586, pp. 486-535. See also M. BRÎNZEI, C. SCHABEL , “Thomas Aquinas as Authority and the Summa as Auctoritas in the Late Middle Ages,” in Summistae. The commentary Tradition on Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologie (15th-18th Century), ed. M. TOSTE , Leiden forthcoming; P. K RUPA, « La lettre en défense de Saint Thomas d'Aquin de Jean de Monzon OP (1388), » in Archivum franciscanum historicum 98 (2005), pp. 633-647; M. L AMY, « Les dominicains dans la tourmente: les suites de l’affaire Jean de Monzon, » in Religion et société urbaine au Moyen âge: études offertes à Jean-Louis Biget par ses anciens élèves, ed. J.-L. B IGET , P. BOUCHERON, J. CHIFFOLEAU (Histoire ancienne et médiévale, 60), Paris 2000, pp. 178-200; J. M. M. H. T HIJSSEN, Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris 1200-1400, Philadelphia 1998, pp. 5, 11-12, 22-23, 38- 39, 107-108, 172. They are also edited in C. D. D’A RGENTRÉ , Collectio Judiciorum de Novis Erroribus, Paris 1728, vol. 1, p. 62b-63b. On Peter of Ailly’s involvement in this process see D. T ABER JR., “Pierre d'Ailly and the Teaching Authority of the Theologian,” in Church History 59/2 (1990), pp. 167-169. His full treatise against Montesono is edited in D’A RGENTRÉ, Collectio Judiciorum 1, pp. 75a-129a: “Tractatus ex parte Universitatis Studii Parisiensis pro causa Fidei, contra quemdam Fratrem Johannem de Montesono Ordinis Praed. editus a Petro de Alliaco Episcopo & Cardinali Cameracensi circa annum 1388.” CUP, 3, n o 1564, pp. 502-504. D. PICHÉ , La condamnation Parisienne de 1277, Paris 1999, p. 144. PETRUS LOMBARDUS, Sententiae 2, d. 30-31, pp. 496-511. PETRUS LOMBARDUS, Sententiae 3, d. 18, pp. 111-118. SULLIVAN, Parisian Licentiates, p. 259. If John of Calore had one of the most straightforward university condemnations, characterized by a simple retractation that pleased everyone, so that the author could move on with his career, John of Montesono represents the exact opposite, an extreme that rippled through the university with far-reaching consequences for the Dominicans, who were excluded from the faculty of theology for a few years as a result of his stubbornness. Montesono had a rich educational trajectory before reading the Sentences in the academic year 1372-1373 at the studium of Barcelona. In 1379 he was bachelor at the university of Paris, preparing for his inception, which took place in 1387 The vesperies themselves have not survived, but the problematic propositions (14 in total: 5 from the vespera, 9 from the resumpta) were faithfully recorded and used in the lengthy process that followed. The condemned propositions can be found in the copy shown to the bishop of Paris in 1387, after the matter spiralled out of the university’s control: CUP, 3, no 1559, pp. 493-495. Peter of Ailly, who was personally involved in the trial, overseeing the enactment of corporate justice, explains not only the ways in which Montesono had erred, but also his nerve as he was doing so. Extracted text DEBATE online